PowerUp Logo
PowerUp
PowerUpPeak Performance

Peak PerformanceWeek 12 of 12

Who's performing at their peak, and why?

Showing data for:

Employee Peak Performance Index is a composite metric designed to assess the current distribution of high-performance capabilities and outcomes across an organisation. It combines individual Personal Performance Scores (out of 1000) with workplace health indicators such as absence rates, presenteeism, and accident data. Employees are grouped into three zones: High, Medium, Low to guide targeted interventions and track organizational improvement over time:​
Green = High (employees already show high-performance capabilities, translating into better outcomes such as lower absences)
Amber = Medium (individuals have emerging capabilities, room for growth and improvement to improve performance and outcomes)
Red = Low (individuals face challenges which PowerUp can help to address).

This index helps organisations understand their workforce's current performance potential. PowerUp is proven to improve the percentage of 'High' employees in the organisation and reduce the number of 'Low' individuals. This can have measurable impact on KPIs, such as customer service, revenue, productivity, absences, presenteeism, health claims.

Current Breakdown

Average Score: 785 / 1000

Analysis of 2,000 employees indicates a robust Peak Performance Index of 785. High peak performers have stabilized at 18%, while the 'frozen middle' shows positive momentum. Key drivers are currently Leadership capability and Performance under pressure scores.

18%
High Peak Potential
of workforce
WoW ↑ 1%Projected ↑ 5%
65%
Medium Peak Potential
of workforce
WoW → 0%Projected ↑ 7%
17%
Low Peak Potential
of workforce
WoW → 0%Projected ↓ 10%

High Performance Analysis - What differentiaties High Performers?

PowerUp is inspired by elite sports, and 'Green' Peak Potential Employees already possess certain capabilities and habits that help them to sustain performance and perform better under pressure. This includes:

+27 ptsCoping with Pressure
80/100 vs 43/100
Able to cope better with pressure
-4 daysAverage Absences
5 days vs 9 Days
Less time off through illness
-14 daysAverage Presenteeism
14 days vs 30 Days
Less worried about attendence
+2 hrsAverage Sleep
7 hrs vs <5 hrs
Greater amount of sleep per evening

Absence & Presenteeism

The hidden cost of reduced productivity - presenteeism accounts for 70% of total employee productivity costs

Average Absences (Last 12m)
17 Days
Out of 464 employees
↑ 1.2% vs last year
Average Presenteeism (Last 12m)
51 Days
290 employees but not fully productive
↑ 2.1% vs last year

12-Week Absence & Presenteeism Trends

Weekly tracking of estimated days lost across the organisation (Absence vs Presenteeism)

Split of Absences/Presenteeism
68
Total Days
Came into Work Unwell 56%
Someone else 23%
Sickness Last Year 17%
Domestic 3%